CWP-10011-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10011-2025 Date of Decision: 08.07.2025 Kuldeep Singh and another ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Baljeet Nain, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to reinstate him w.e.f. October’ 2022. 2. The petitioners were relieved in October’ 2022. They were working with HAFED-respondent No.3 through HKRNL on contract basis. They have filed instant petition for reinstatement. They were relieved in October’ 2022. They were contractual employees. 3. Mr. Prince Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, who on advance notice is present in Court, submits that Kuldeep Singh- petitioner No.1 is working with respondent through outsource agency for the last 2 months. Thus, his grievance is not sustainable. Shivani Gupta 2025.07.08 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10011-2025 2 4. Without commenting on merit, instant petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner No.2 to approach HKRNL for his deployment in accordance with law. 08.07.2025 (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking Yes Whether reportable No Shivani Gupta 2025.07.08 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document