Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42864 (CHH)

NARAYAN SARDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10585/2025 · 2025-09-11

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:46821 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10585 of 2025 1 - Narayan Sardar S/o Mathura Aged About 40 Years Presently Working on The Post of Panchayat Secretary And Posted At Village - Panchayat - Jarhadih, Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur, District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat - Balrampur, District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur, District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Ratan Singh, Working on The Post of Panchayat Secretary And Posted At Village Panchayat - Badkimahari, Janpad Panchayat - Balrampur, District - Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For State-respondents : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.4 Mr. Mukesh K. Kaushik, Advocate on caveat. Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 12-09-2025 1. The petitioner, who is working as Panchayat Secretary has been transferred from Village Panchayat Jarhadih, Janpad Panchayat Balrampur to Village Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.12 19:13:28 +0530 2 Panchayat Pachawal, Janpad Panchayat Balrampur (C.G.) vide transfer order dated 20-08-2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the said transfer order the petitioner wants to move representation before the transferring authority, therefore, he may be permitted to avail the remedy of representation before the concerned authority. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any objection on the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents annexed with the writ petition. 5. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to move his representation before the respondent No.2 within a week and in the eventuality of filing the representation within a week from today by the petitioner, respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within a week from today before respondent No.2. 7. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil