Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42860 (AP)

PALNADU FAMILY RESTAURANT AND BAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11003/2024 · 2025-11-16

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010219232024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11003/2024 Between: 1. PALNADU FAMILY RESTAURANT AND BAR, KONDAMUDU JUNCTION, PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS LICENCE P. RAMI REDDY . ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EXCISE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT BUREAU (SEB) STATION, PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned orders in Rc.No.243/2022/B2, dated 04.05.2024 of the 2nd Respondent in suspending the petitioner bar license without affording opportunity of personal hearing and without issuing show cause notice in gross violation of principles of natural justice, as illegal, arbitrary in violation of Article 19(1)(g) and 21 of The Constitution of India and consequently set aside the aforesaid impugned suspension order of the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned orders of the 2nd Respondent in Rc.No.243/2022/B2, dated 04.05.2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11003 OF 2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time the cause in the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.11.2025 KBN 50 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11003 of 2024 Date: 17.11.2025 KBN