Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42857 (KAR)

M N ASHOKA v. NEELAMMA

RFA/642/2020 · 2025-09-02

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34348-DB RFA No. 642 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 642 OF 2020 (PA/DE/IN) BETWEEN: 1. M.N ASHOKA S/O M.P.NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577 201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 2. M.MANJUNATH S/O M.P.NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577 201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 3. BHAGYA W/O LAVA D/O M.P.NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O HUNNASODU VILLAGE ABBALAGERE POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577 201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. P.N HARISH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34348-DB RFA No. 642 of 2020 AND: 1. NEELAMMA W/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 2. JAGADISH S/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 3. RAVINDRA @ RAVI S/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 4. PANCHAKSHARI S/O LATE SHANMUKAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 5. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI -577201, SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34348-DB RFA No. 642 of 2020 6. MANJAPPA S/O NANJUNDAPPA (H/O LATE GOWRAMMA) AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/O VIDYANAGARA, 10TH CROSS, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 201. 7. CHANNABASAPPA S/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O VIDYANAGARA, 10TH CROSS, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 201. 8. GAVI S/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O VIDYANAGARA, 10TH CROSS, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 201. 9. LAVA S/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/O HUNNASODU VILLAGE ABBALAGERE POST, HOLALUR HOBLI-577 201 SHIVMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 10. KUSHA S/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O VIDYANAGARA, 10TH CROSS, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 201. 11. NAGARATHNA W/O BASAVARAJAPPA D/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O VIDYANAGARA, 4TH CROSS, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34348-DB RFA No. 642 of 2020 12. SHANTHAMMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR D/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O CHATTANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577201. 13. LAKSHMI W/O HALESHAPPA D/O MANJAPPA AND GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O KUMBALUR VILLAGE AND POST, HONNALI TALUK-577301. DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. 14. SHIVARAJ S/O CHANDRASHEKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O ABBALAGERE VILLAGE/POST, HOLALUR HOBLI-577201 SHIVAMOGGA TALUK & DISTRICT. 15. SMT. SUHAS VASANT DIVEKAR @ SUHAS DIVEKAR W/O VASANT DIVEKAR D/O LATE ARAVIND SADASHIV KELKAR AGED ABOUT 59 EYRS R/O INDIRA, II CROSS, TILAKNAGARA, SHIVAMOGGA CITY-577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. GOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R4 & R15, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R14 - SERVED-UNREPRESENTED) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.12.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.24/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION, DECLARATION & PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34348-DB RFA No. 642 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter is settled out of Court and a memo has also been filed to that effect. 2. The said memo is taken on record. 3. In the above view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70