Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42857 (AP)

Dasari Kranthi alias Rama Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/10956/2025 · 2025-10-30

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010550232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10956/2025 Between: DASARI KRANTHI ALIAS RAMA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, A RESIDENT OF ASHOK NAGAR, GUDUR TOWN OF PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2.TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. (A-2). ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Rapur Circle, Kandaleru Police Station, SPSR Nellore District, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: BASHEER AHMED Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.10956 of 2025 Dated 31.10.2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 437 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.’)/ Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.2 on bail in Crime.No.16 of 2025 of Kandaleru Police Station, SPSR Nellore District, registered against the petitioner/Accused No.2 herein for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this is the second bail application. Earlier, this Court in Crl.P.No.9189 of 2025, vide order dated 18.09.2025, dismissed the first bail application on the ground that the FSL report was awaited and the final charge sheet had not been filed against all the accused. This Court enlarged Accused No.3 on bail vide order dated 16.10.2025 in Crl.P.No.10475 of 2025, as his case stood on a different footing. 3 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.10956 of 2025 Dated 31.10.2025 4. The allegation against the petitioner/Accused No.2 is that he agreed to receive an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- from Accused No.1 for doing away with the life of Shaik Shafi (deceased) and had received Rs.50,000/- as an advance from Accused No.1. The petitioner was arrested on 23.05.2025 and he has been in judicial custody for the past 130 days. After filing of the final charge sheet and on perusal of the same, the accusation is well founded against the petitioner/Accused No.2. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the gravity and nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner/Accused No.2, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.2 on bail at this juncture. Hence, the Criminal Petition is liable to be dismissed. 6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 31.10.2025 RSI 4 Dr. YLR, J Crl.P.No.10956 of 2025 Dated 31.10.2025 24 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.10956 of 2025 Date: 31.10.2025 RSI