Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42855 (AP)

AVANI RESOURCES PTE LTD v. RASTHRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD (RINL)

WP/22594/2024 · 2025-10-30

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010442332024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22594/2024 Between: 1. AVANI RESOURCES PTE LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. UJJWAL JAIN, 143 CECIL STREET . 24-01/02 GB BUILDING SINGAPORE- 069542 ...PETITIONER AND 1. RASTHRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD RINL, Administrative Building, Vishakapatnam Steel Plant, Vishakapatnam- 530031, Andhra Pradesh, India ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue order or orders or a direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS, against the Respondent on account of their inaction in remitting the admitted dues to the Petitioner company and consequentially directing the Respondent to remit the principal outstanding of a sum of USD 26,166,525 (US Dollars Twenty Six Million One Hundred and Sixty Six Thousand Five Hundred and Twenty Five) and the interest, calculated at the rate of 8.84 percentage p.a., amounting to USD 995,927.02 (Nine Hundred and Ninety Five Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Seven and two cents), as on 01.09.2024, and such further sums towards interest till the date of repayment, to the Petitioner company, as expeditiously as possible within a timeframe as may be determined by this Honorable Court to be just and reasonable, by considering the representations of the Petitioner dated 03.09.2024 and 10.09.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent to deposit 50 (Fifty percent) of the admitted dues, which is a sum of USD 13,581,226 (US Dollars Thirteen Million Five Hundred and Eighty One Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Six) before this Honourable Court pending disposal of the Writ Petition and thus render justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S The Court made the following: ORDER:- Heard Sri Kothapalli Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioner and S. Vivek Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to avail the remedies available under law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:31.10.2025 MVK 3 210 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 22594 of 2024 Date:31.10.2025 MVK