Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42852 (AP)

B DEVADANAM v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/3751/2019 · 2025-11-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010080842019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3751/2019 Between: 1. B DEVADANAM, S/O. PERIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- VEGETABLE VENDOR, R/O. DOOR NO.1-112, RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, PEDAKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARAVATHI POLICE STATION, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. CHEKURI MOSHE, S/O.RATHIAH, AGED ABOUT 60, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.MUNUGODU VILLAGE, AMRAVATHI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3 in acting on the complaint, dated 05-03-2019 and registering the crime against the respondent No.4 as 2 arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to act on the compliant, dated 05-03-2019 submitted by me and take action against the respondent No.4 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents No. 2 and 3 to act on the compliant, dated 05-03-2019 submitted by me and take action against the respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3751 OF 2019 ORDER: Learned counsel representing Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the writ petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 14.11.2025 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24 WRIT PETITION No:3751 OF 2019 Date: 14.11.2025 W PSK