CRM-M-18765-2025 -1- 142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18765-2025 Decided on: 04.04.2025 Vinod Manchanda ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr.C.L. Pawar, Advocate, Mr. Satveer Singh Badal, Advocate and Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. 1. Prayer in the present second petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case FIR No. 157 dated 11.12.2024, registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib, District Fatehgarh Sahib. 2. Earlier the petitioner approached this Court by way of filing CRM-M-19-2025 and after learned counsel for the petitioner, when the Court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, the same was allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 24.02.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that present petition is the second petition filed by the petitioner due to change of circumstances. He has submitted before this Court that the enquiries were carried out by the Superintendent of Police (Rural), SAS Nagar and Superintendent of Police (Local), SAS Nagar and CIA Inspector on 10.05.2024, 12.08.2024 and 11.12.2024, respectively. His main thrust of argument is regarding change of circumstance is to the effect that in view of the enquiries conducted, false implication of the petitioner is writ large. SHARMILA DEVI 2025.04.09 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC CRM-M-18765-2025 -2- He submits that these multiple enquiries would prove the false implication of the petitioner. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, it is apparent that the enquiries which are relied upon by counsel for the petitioner, were prior to the order passed by this Court, when he was allowed to withdraw his petition for the grant of anticipatory bail. Arguing the same would not amount to change in the circumstance. Thus, this Court does not find any ground to entertain the present petition and thus, the same is hereby dismissed. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 04.04.2025 JUDGE sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2025.04.09 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC