IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 738 of 2025 ------ 1. Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar, aged about 18 years, s/o late Brahmdeo Yadav 2. Surendra Yadav @ Gohna Yadav @ Sulendra Kumar, aged about 19 years, s/o Kana @ Podak Yadav Both r/o Village-Kendua No. 4, Khatal, P.O.-Kusunda, P.S.-Kenduadih, Dist.-Dhanbad … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh B. Lal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 05.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Kenduadih P.S. Case No.96 of 2024 registered under sections 191(2)/191(3)/190/127(1)/333/115(2)352/351(2)/109/74 of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 25(1-B)(a)/26/27 of Arms Act. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being member of unlawful assembly attempted to murder the members of the informant party by firing in the air. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and in this respect, learned counsel for the petitioners draw the attention of this Court to the copy of the certified copy of the affidavit filed by the informant in the court of Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in A.B.P. No. 3656 of 2024. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Kenduadih P.S. Case No.96 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-