Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-9552-2025 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9552-2025 Date of Decision: 04.04.2025 Anil Kumar
......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Ms. Nikita Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to decide his representation dated 05.11.2024 (Annexure P-9) and legal notice dated 07.01.2025 (Annexure P- 10).
2.
The petitioner claims that he was appointed under DESM Category on 05.11.2014. He had secured 37.15 marks. There was another selected candidate who had secured 31.08 marks. The petitioner has been shown junior to said candidate in the seniority list. He has filed representation dated 05.11.2024 which was followed by legal notice dated 07.01.2025.
3.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana, who on advance notice is present in Court, submits that competent authority would decide representation of the petitioner within 3 months from today.
4.
Ms. Nikita Singh agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. Shivani Gupta 2025.04.04 17:36
CWP-9552-2025 2
5.
In the wake of statement of both sides, instant petition stands
disposed of. 04.04.2025
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani
JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes Whether reportable
No
Shivani Gupta 2025.04.04 17:36