Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42841 (RAJ)

PRIYA W/O DINESH SHASTRI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16930/2025 · 2025-11-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46528] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16930/2025 Priya W/o Dinesh Shastri, Aged About 46 Years, R/o A-231, Triveni Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Principal, Mahatma Gandhi Govt. School, Punayata, Pali. 4. Vijay Sharma, Principal At Mahatma Gandhi Govt. School, Khairwa, Pali. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar and Ms. Pooja Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been preferred with following prayer; It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petitiojn and further be pleased to : i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the impugned order dated 22.09.2025 (Annex.2) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) By an approrpriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to continue the petitioner on the post of Principal at Mahatama Gandhi Govt. School, Punayata, Pali iii) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:46528] (2 of 2) [CW-16930/2025] 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J TANISHA /46