- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32779 RSA No. 841 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.841 OF 2020(INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS SMT. AJAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, 2. SRI K.M.SUBBEGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 3. SRI.K.M.CHIKKEGOWDA S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 4. SRI.K.M.ANANDARAJU S/O LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KOIRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MANOJ.N FOR SRI SANJAY KRISHNA V, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SRI. RAMAMURTHY S/O LATE K.S.KRISHNAPPA, Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32779 RSA No. 841 of 2020 AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KOIRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI-562110 DEVANAHALLI TALUK 2. SMT. V. SHYLAJA W/O SRI. RAMAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KOIRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI-562110 DEVANAHALLI TALUK 3. SRI.V. VENUKUMAR S/O H. VENKATASWAMY GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDENT OF VANIGARAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R.CHANDRANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI RAGHAVENDRA.V, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.02.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.15070/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.04.2018 PASSED ON I.A. IN O.S.NO.164/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, ALLOWING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32779 RSA No. 841 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants has filed memo, which reads as under: “The undersigned most respectfully submits that the above appeal may kindly be dismissed as ‘withdrawn’ in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR