APHC010566942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29429/2025 Between: 1. S KOTI REDDY, S/O.KOTI REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/O.NEAR SWAMY SCHOOL, PRAKASH NAGAR, NARSORAOPET TOWN, PALANADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALANADU DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAR.SORAOPFTT I TOWN, P.S, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARSORAOPET POLICE STATION, PALANADU DISTRICT. 5. RAMISETTY SOBHANADRESWARA RAO BUJJI, S/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O.NEAR SRIRASTHU KALYANA MANDAPAM, BHARAMPET,NARSORAOPET TOWN AND MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order declaring the action of the respondents interfering in a purely civil dispute and continuously harassing petitioner and his family by frequently visiting his residence at Narsoraopet and threatening petitioner, his wife and family members as the same is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution apart from being violative of BNSS and settled principles of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not interfering in civil disputes and not to harass petitioner or his family members and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NANDIREDDY VISHNU VARDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner, seeking the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order declaring the action of the respondents interfering in a purely civil dispute and continuously harassing petitioner and his family by frequently visiting his residence at Narasaraopet and threatening petitioner, his wife and family members as the same is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution apart from being violative of BNSS and settled principles of law and to pass ...” At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that after due enquiry, it came to know that there are civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and respondent No.5 and that respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes and never threatened the petitioner and his family members. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except following due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 29429 of 2025 30.10.2025 Mjl /*