1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10598 of 2025 1 - Vinesh Nair S/o Late Shankaran Vasudevan Nair Aged About 48 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Karanpur, Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Rameshwari Nair W/o Vinesh Nair Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Madpal , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 3 - Kriparam Baghel S/o Late Uttam Ram Baghel Aged About 46 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Manjhiguda , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 4 - Lenka Vikas Naidu S/o Late L. Eshwar Rao Naidu Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Upanpal , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 5 - Rameshwar Lal Sahu S/o Bhuvneshwar Singh Sahu Aged About 46 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Dhanpunji , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 6 - Balram Nirmal S/o Late Duryodhan Nirmal Aged About 51 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Upper Primary School Upanpal , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 7 - Humeshwar Belsariya S/o Late Padum Singh Aged About 48 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Upper Primary School Machkot , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 8 - Prem Singh Nayak S/o Laivan Nayak Aged About 39 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Badekawali , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 9 - Gulshan Sethiya S/o Jayman Sethiya Aged About 55 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Badekawali , Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.09.15 10:05:23 +0530 2 10 - Shyamsunder Bakde S/o Narsingh Bakde Aged About 35 Years Posted And Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Dulapara , Block Bastanar District - Bastar (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director Bilaspur Education Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Bastar, District - Bastar (C.G.) 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bastar District - Bastar (C.G.) 7 - Block Education Officer Block Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 9 - Collector Jagdalpur District - Bastar (C.G.) 10 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bastanar District - Bastar (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Sahu, on behalf of Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate For Respondent(s) For Res. No. 6 : : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate on advance copy Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 12/09/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika