RAM SURAT PRASAD AND 4 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS.
WRIA/15067/2017 · 2025-04-28
Donadi Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42821 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42821 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66532 Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15067 of 2017 Petitioner :- Ram Surat Prasad And 4 Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajai Kumar Singh Kushwaha,Krishna Kant Vishwakarma,P.K. Singh,Rajesh Kumar Singh,Rakesh Pande (Senior Adv.),Sr. Advocate,Vijay Krishna Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pushkar Kushwaha,S.C. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for the following reliefs:
"(i) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.3 i.e. Director of Education U.P. (Samanya) Tritiya Anubhag, Allahabad to consider and decide the representation dated 12.10.2016 with the reasoned fixed by the Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.4 i.e. Joint Director Education, Vararnasi Region, Varanasi to provide consequential benefit to the petitioners since 18.04.2001 and arrear should be paid to the all petitioners with due panel interest on the amount whatsoever. (iii) Issue any writ, order or direction of the suitable nature as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
2. On merits, the learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that though the posts were sanctioned based on the recommendation made by the Management/ Institution for sanction of 23 posts but the respondents have not accorded approval to the entire posts. Only limited posts were sanctioned and some of the teachers were absorbed into those posts on 18.04.2001 leaving the petitioners' posts.
3. Subsequently, the State has approved the remaining posts in the year 2014, though the petitioners are entitled since 18.04.2001.
4. As the petitioners' prayer in the present writ petition is not with regard to the such claim, hence the learned counsel for the petitioners requested to withdraw the present writ petition with
liberty to file a fresh petition with specific prayer.
5. Accordingly, permission is granted.
6. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Shiv (Donadi Ramesh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIV KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad