Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4282 (MAD)

A.Yadava Prakash, v. Mr. K.Srinivasan, IAS., and another

CONT P/2147/2025 · 2026-04-15

Mohammed Shaffiq

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CONT P No. 2147 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ CONT P No. 2147 of 2025 and Sub Appl. No.13 of 2026 A.Yadava Prakash, Son of K.Ashok Kumar, Assistant Section Officer, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Mr. K.Srinivasan, IAS., The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. Mr. G.Prakash, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: The Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971, To punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No. 3295 of 2021 dated 10.01.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2147 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): M/s. R.Jayaprakash For Respondent(s): Ms.Dhakshyani Reddy, Special Panel Counsel Assisted by Mr.S.John J. Raja Singh, Additional Government Pleader ORDER This Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No. 3295 of 2021 dated 10.01.2024. 2. It is submitted by the learned Special Panel Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 that the orders have been complied with. Further, learned Special Panel Counsel would submit that orders have been passed fixing the seniority in compliance with the direction of this Court in WP No.3295 of 2021 dated 10.01.2024, whereas the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that there are certain infirmities in fixing the seniority. When it was pointed out that this is not the subject matter of enquiry in contempt. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would only seek liberty of this Court to challenge the same in the manner known to law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2147 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 4. In view thereof, the Contempt Petition is closed. It is open to petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law, if aggrieved. Consequently, the Sup Application is closed. 15-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No jv To 1. Mr. K.Srinivasan, IAS., The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. Mr. G.Prakash, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CONT P No. 2147 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. jv CONT P No. 2147 of 2025 15-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis