CHHAJU SINGH v. HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD AND ORS
FAO/3936/2019 · 2025-05-02
Lok Adalat Bench
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42819 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42819 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
DAILY LOK ADALAT
510
Present:
2019 passed by the learned MACT, Chandigarh. Vide this award, an amount of Rs.1,05,0 of the claimant/appellant and it has been stated that the amount of compensation would be paid by the Insurance Company, which shall have right to recover the same from respondents 1 and 2 i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle. Incidentally, resp i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle did not contest the matter before the learned tribunal nor have they filed any appeal to challenge the aforesaid award.
submits that the cla Rs.40,000/ MACT is respondent
modifying the award of the learned MACT, Chandigarh to the extent that the appellant shall be entitled to another amount of Rs.40,000/ over & above the amount already awarded by the learned MACT.
disposed of.
of.
parties.
02.05.2025 NainaRajput DAILY LOK ADALAT
FAO-3936-2019 CHHAJU SINGH VS HDFC ERGO
Mr. Pushpinder Kaushal, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for HDFC ERGO GIC.
* * * *
This appeal is directed against the award dated March 20, 2019 passed by the learned MACT, Chandigarh. Vide this award, an amount of Rs.1,05,030/- has been awarded as compensation in favour of the claimant/appellant and it has been stated that the amount of compensation would be paid by the Insurance Company, which shall have right to recover the same from respondents 1 and 2 i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle. Incidentally, resp i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle did not contest the matter before the learned tribunal nor have they filed any appeal to challenge the aforesaid award.
Learned counsel for the that the claimant will feel satisfied if another amount of Rs.40,000/- over & above the amount already awarded by the learned allowed to him. The proposal has been accepted by the respondent-Insurance Company.
In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of modifying the award of the learned MACT, Chandigarh to the extent that the appellant shall be entitled to another amount of Rs.40,000/ over & above the amount already awarded by the learned MACT.
With this modification only in the award, this appeal
disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed
A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the
( 02.05.2025
BENCH NO.3 CHHAJU SINGH VS HDFC ERGO GIC LTD. & ORS. Mr. Pushpinder Kaushal, Advocate for the appellant. anjeev Kodan, Advocate for HDFC ERGO GIC. is directed against the award dated March 20, 2019 passed by the learned MACT, Chandigarh. Vide this award, an has been awarded as compensation in favour of the claimant/appellant and it has been stated that the amount of compensation would be paid by the Insurance Company, which shall have right to recover the same from respondents 1 and 2 i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle. Incidentally, respondents 1 and 2 i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle did not contest the matter before the learned tribunal nor have they filed any appeal to challenge
Learned counsel for the appellant in his statement satisfied if another amount of over & above the amount already awarded by the learned allowed to him. The proposal has been accepted by the In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of by modifying the award of the learned MACT, Chandigarh to the extent that the appellant shall be entitled to another amount of Rs.40,000/- over & above the amount already awarded by the learned MACT. With this modification only in the award, this appeal is iscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the
(G.C. GARG) PRESIDENT (MAHAVIR SINGH CHAUHAN) MEMBER
is directed against the award dated March 20, 2019 passed by the learned MACT, Chandigarh. Vide this award, an has been awarded as compensation in favour of the claimant/appellant and it has been stated that the amount of compensation would be paid by the Insurance Company, which shall have right to recover the same from respondents 1 and 2 i.e. owner ondents 1 and 2 i.e. owner and driver of the offending vehicle did not contest the matter before the learned tribunal nor have they filed any appeal to challenge in his statement satisfied if another amount of over & above the amount already awarded by the learned allowed to him. The proposal has been accepted by the by modifying the award of the learned MACT, Chandigarh to the extent - is iscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the ) PRESIDENT
) MEMBER NAINA KATHIAT 2025.05.06 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document