Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42808 (KAR)

SRI H B GOPAL v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/48025/2018 · 2025-11-21

Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48290 WP No. 48025 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K WRIT PETITION NO. 48025 OF 2018 (KLR-CON) BETWEEN: SRI H.B GOPAL S/O LATE H BHADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 1371 RAJKUMAR NAGARA, KUNIGAL - 572 130 TUMKUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. T GOVINDARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR LR'S OF DECEASED - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMKUR - 572 101 TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT. H B VASANTHA D/O LATE H.B BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 3. SMT. LILAVATHI D/O LATE H.B BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 4. SMT. H.B SHANTHA D/O LATE H.B BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48290 WP No. 48025 of 2018 5. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE H.B BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 ARE R/O NO. 295, 19TH MAIN ROAD, MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003. 6. SRI M.K SATHISH S/O LATE KANTHARAJ SETTEE AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O CHINMAI, NEW EXTENSION, RAJKUMAR NAGARA KUNIGAL - 572 130 TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA K PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1, SRI. P.M. SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R6 - ABSENT) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ORDER DTD 3.12.2014 VIDE ANNX-J OF THE R-1. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48290 WP No. 48025 of 2018 ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner even on the second call. 2. The order sheet reveals that ever since 2022, the petitioner has failed to do the needful and to comply with the office objections. Since the writ petition is of the year 2018, it could be presumed that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8