[2025:RJ-JP:46218-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1196/2023 Dr. Renu Chaturvedi W/o. Shri Dinesh Chaturvedi, Resident Of 53/35, Near Apex Institute, Veer Tejaji Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.) 302020 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Narayan Lal Meena, Ias, Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Higher Education, Shiksha Shankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur. (Raj.) 2. Shri Sunil Sharma, I.a.s. Director Cum Commissioner, College Education, Jln Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Shri Akhilesh Sharma, Secretary, Pragbandh Samiti, Sri Sathya Sai College For Woman, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Shri Bhawani Singh Detha, Ias, Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 5. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Higher Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG through VC Mr. Deepak Sharma for Mr. Ashish Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 17/11/2025 It has been pointed out that on the similar set of facts, vide order dated 11.11.2025 passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.597/2025, involving the contempt of order dated 01.12.2021, following order was passed by the Division Bench of this High Court with the consent of counsel for the respective parties:- [2025:RJ-JP:46218-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-1196/2023] “This civil contempt petition is disposed of in following termsas agreed and requested by the learned counsels for there spective parties:- 1. In view of Division Bench judgment dated21.08.2025 passed by this Court in D.B.Civil Contempt Petition No.1666/2018:Dr. Anil KumarMathur & Ors. Versus Mr. Ashutosh A.T. Pednekar & Ors. and other connected matters, this civil contempt petition is dismissed. 2. However, rights and liabilities of the parties in the subject-matter of dispute shall remain subject to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Petition preferred against the aforesaid judgment. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed off.” In view of the above, this contempt petition also stands disposed of in terms of the order dated 11.11.2025. Notices stand discharged. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/66