[2025:RJ-JP:50072] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15802/2025 Sanjay Kumar Singhal S/o Late Shri Ramesh Chand Singhal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o A-30-A, Parth Sarthi Residency, Laxmi Nagar, Khejro Ka Bas, Patrakar Road, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director (Non Gazetted) Medical And Helath Department, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Swami Mr. Rakesh Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “(i) Quash and set aside the order dated 23.09.2025, issued by the Director, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Services Rajasthan, Jaipur, by which representation of the petitioner has been rejected/dismissed. (ii) the respondents to grant all consequential benefits alongwith notional benefits, seniority and all other consequential service benefits to the humble petitioner from the date when the respondent at first time given appointment to other candidates in the same recruitment and make pay fixation accordingly. (iii) to pay the arrears of consequential benefits with interest @ 18% per annum. [2025:RJ-JP:50072] (2 of 3) [CW-15802/2025] (iv) Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the favour of applicants may also be passed.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 17.04.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5181/2023 titled as Praveen Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court (on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Dara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11973/2012, decided on 17.12.2012). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of Praveen Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Dara Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Praveen Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Dara Singh Vs. State of [2025:RJ-JP:50072] (3 of 3) [CW-15802/2025] Rajasthan and Ors., but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/248