Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42792 (RAJ)

SMT. PREM DEVI W/O SHRI BABULAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18900/2025 · 2025-12-18

Sandeep Taneja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51145] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18900/2025 1. Smt. Prem Devi W/o Shri Babulal Saini, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Sheikhpura, Abhaneri, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.) 2. Smt. Laddo Devi W/o Shri Ramdhan Saini, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sheikhpura, Abhaneri, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Dausa. 3. Sub- Divisional Officer (Sdo), Bandikui, District Dausa. 4. Thesildar, Bandikui, District Dausa. 5. Sub- Tehsildar, Abhaneri, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 18/12/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the notice dated 06.10.2025 issued under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by Sub-Tehsildar Abhaneri, Bandikui, District Dausa for removal of encroachment on the subject land. 2. The petitioners have directly approached this Court, without filing the reply to the said notice. Hence, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. 3. This Court is of the view that the petitioners are required to approach the concerned respondent, who has issued the impugned notice to the petitioners, by way of filing reply / [2025:RJ-JP:51145] (2 of 2) [CW-18900/2025] representation along-with the relevant documents in support thereof. 4. It is directed that in case, any such reply / representation is submitted by the petitioners within a period of one week from today, the concerned respondent will look into the matter and pass reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter strictly in accordance with law. 5. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. All pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J DEEPAK /8