IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 449 of 2024 Abdul Gani Ansari, S/o Majid Miyan, R/o Dihi, Murup, PO & PS- Latehar, District-Latehar … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Collector, Latehar 3. The Circle Officer, Latehar … … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashikant Ojha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Krishna Kr Bhatt, AC to SC-I ----- 05/06.01.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to make correction and mention exact area in Register-II of the raiyati land of the petitioner appertaining to Khata No. 34, Plot Nos. 551 & 563 measuring an area of 1.12 acres and 0.74 acre respectively under Mouza- Amwatikar, Thana No. 255, Halka No. 4, District-Latehar, recorded in the name of Bhagan Jolha (great grandfather of the petitioner) as per Khatiyan (Register-I) and Record of Rights, however, in the online Register-II, the area of the aforesaid land has wrongly been shown as zero with further direction to the concerned respondent to accept rent of the said land from the petitioner. Further prayer has been made for issuance to direction upon the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to dispose of the representations of the petitioner’s family members dated 01.06.2022, 20.09.2022 and 01.11.2022. 2. Mr. Krishna Kumar Bhatt, AC to SC-I appearing on behalf of the respondents, refers to paragraph no. 7 of the counter affidavit dated 25.09.2024 filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3, which reads as under: “7. That it is humbly stated and submitted that so far as 2 W.P.(C). No. 449 of 2024 the question of register-II of Khata No. 34, Plot Nos. 551 & 563, Area 1.12 acres and 0.74 acre, respectively, situated at Mauza-Amwatikar, is concerned, its area in online register-II is showing to be zero. On the application made by the petitioner, the online register-II had already been updated as per the offline register-II and after the verification report of the Revenue Sub- Inspector, Circle Inspector and Ameen Report. In Khata No. 34, Plot No. 551 and Plot No. 563, 1 acre 12 decimals and 16 decimals respectively were updated. The compliance had already been done. Photocopy of the Offline Register-II, Verification Report and updated Online Register-II are annexed herewith and marked as Annexure-A. 3. It is thus submitted that the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition has been redressed. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts as stated in paragraph no. 7 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3, there is no need to further proceed in the matter. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish