RIZWANA PARWEEN W/O LATE MOHAMMED AHMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18479/2025 · 2025-12-08
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42784 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42784 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49961] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18479/2025 Rizwana Parween W/o Late Mohammed Ahmad, R/o Azam Shah Ki Masjid Ke Pass, Kali Paltan, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self Government, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director Local Bodies, G-3 Rajmahal Residency Area, Near Civil Line Phatak, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, Tonk
4. Mohammad Miya Gulzar S/o Late Mohammed Ahmad, R/o Kali Paltan, Azam Shah Ki Masjid,tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby respondents may kindly be directed to recover the maintenance amount lump sum from
the
Year
2014
to 2024 from accumulated PF etc. of the private respondent and pay accumulated maintenance amount to the petitioner. The
respondents
may
be further directed to ensure payment of regular maintenance to
the
petitioner
from salary / service emoluments of
[2025:RJ-JP:49961] (2 of 2) [CW-18479/2025] private respondents or in failure terminate the services of the private respondent with immediate effect. b) Any other order or direction, this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /274