M/s. Munuswamy Educational and Development Society, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PARADESH
WP/23319/2021 · 2025-11-17
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42779 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42779 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010382272021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23319/2021 Between:
1. M/S. MUNUSWAMY EDUCATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY,, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, SRI P.KISHORE KUMAR, S/O.NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 4TH LINE, GOPALNAGAR ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PARADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY TO SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, SCHOOL EDUCATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA,
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GUNTUR.
4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, STATE DISASTER RESPONSE AND FIRE SERVICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
2
pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in insisting to obtain Fire No Objection Certificate from the 5th respondent for renewal of recognition of the petitioner's institution of Gowtami High School, Ongole, Prakasam District is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of AP Fire Services of 1999 and contrary to the guidelines of National Building Code Act 2016 and violative of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to issue renewal of the recognition for the petitioner's institutions after receipt of requisite payment of applicable fee without insisting Fire No Objection Certificate from the 5th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to issue renewal of recognition to the petitioner's institution of Gowtami High School, Ongole, Prakasam District without insisting Fire No Objection Certificate from the 5th respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23319 of 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in insisting to obtain Fire No Objection Certificate from the 5th respondent for renewal of recognition of the petitioner's institution of Gowtami High School, Ongole, Prakasam District is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of AP Fire Services of 1999 and contrary to the guidelines of National Building Code Act 2016 and violative of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to issue renewal of the recognition for the petitioner's institutions after receipt of requisite payment of applicable fee without insisting Fire No Objection Certificate from the 5th respondent and pass.…”
2. Heard Sri Koti Reddy Idamakanti, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Education for the Respondents. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Education brought to the notice of this Court that the relief has become infructuous in this matter, since the Petitioner himself addressed a letter to the D.E.O dated 14.11.2021, to the effect that the Department has issued the recognition and he wanted to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
4
4.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of.
5. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no Order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.11.2025. UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.23319 of 2021
Dated.18.11.2025
UPS
42