Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42777 (RAJ)

GIRRAJ PRASAD S/O SHYAMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19750/2025 · 2025-12-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51398] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19750/2025 Girraj Prasad S/o Shyama, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Bada Mohalla, Near Shivshakti School, Kmala Road, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary To Govt., Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Secretary To Govt., Planning Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. The Secretary And Commissioner, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to provide promotional avenues to the Petitioner as available to the persons appointed along with petitioner on the post of LDC in other departments; ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, in alternatively [2025:RJ-JP:51398] (2 of 3) [CW-19750/2025] the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the pay scale to the petitioner equivalent to the persons appointed along with petitioner on the post of LDC in other departments i.e. in the grade pay of Rs. 6600/-; iii) Issue an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner as law laid down by this Hon'ble High Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP NO. 1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:51398] (3 of 3) [CW-19750/2025] 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /507