Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4277 (RAJ)

RAJU S/O SUNDER v. NAGAR NIGAM BHARATPUR

CW/2858/2025 · 2025-04-30

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18223] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2858/2025 Raju S/o Sunder, R/o Purani Kacheri Ke Peeche Harijan Basti Bharatpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Nagar Nigam Bharatpur, Mathura Gate Bharatpur Through Its Secretary. 2. Director Local Self Goverment Department, Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pallav Choudhary For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 30/04/2025 During course of arguments, counsel for the petitioner admits that inadvertently, instead of applying the word “Compassionate Appointment” in the body of writ petition, he has used the word “Compensatory Appointment”, which is factually incorrect, hence, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/50