[2025:RJ-JP:46230] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14198/2025 Sahid Alias Titto S/o Sh. Jabarkhan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Piruka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vafik Choudhary For State For Complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sanjay Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 105/2025 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 125 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family and is aged approximately 37 years. It is submitted that applicant is in custody ever since 02.09.2025 and that there is one criminal antecedent registered against the applicant. It is also submitted that there is no injury from gun-shot, which is recovered from the applicant. Further, it is submitted that injury is not attributed to the applicant. [2025:RJ-JP:46230] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14198/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that co-accused, who had been granted bail, was not implicated or attributed to the injury caused to head, which is serious and life threatening. Nevertheless, in the instant mater allegations of heinous nature are made, and the applicant is the primary accused. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant is primary accused; that matter is of heinous nature; that injury caused to head is life threatening; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed, at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /320