APHC010574482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 29891/2025 Between: Shaik Ghousia Begam ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: -2- W.P. No.29891 OF 2025 Date of order:31.10.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.29891 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The petitioner has purchased Ac.0.03 cents of land in Sy.No.1581 of Chennampalle Village, Badvel Mandal, YSR (Kadapa) District, which was originally assigned to one Shaik Khadeerunin the year 1996. The vendor of the petitioner purchased the said property in the year 2008. Thereafter, the petitioner’s husband purchased the property in the year 2018. The petitioner’s husband also applied for permission for construction and erected a small residential unit. It is submitted that the respondent authorities, without issuing any notice, have demolished the said building and are now in the process of laying a drainage pipeline by displacing the petitioner from the property. 2. The learned standing counsel appearing for the 5th respondent submits that the building permission was not sanctioned and that the petitioner only submitted an application and paid relevant fee. It is also stated that there is no construction in the said property and that the drainage pipeline would have to be laid for the public purpose. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the 5th respondent, the writ petition can be disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the said property without following due process of law. It is also made clear that in the event the property of the petitioner is -3- W.P. No.29891 OF 2025 Date of order:31.10.2025 required for public purpose, the respondents would have to follow the procedure as contemplated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV