APHC010028022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2276/2025 Between: 1. MOHAMMED MUBASHIRA, WIFE OF RAHIMUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCCUPATION HOMEMAKER, A RESIDENT OF 15-43, NAMBOUR VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, 256-A, RAISINA ROAD, RAJPATH AREA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI, 11000. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, , SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SECUNDERABAD. 3. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA. 4. MOHAMMED RAHIMUDDIN, SON OF KHAZA MOHIDDIN, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. OCCUPATION TECHNICIAN, OVERHEAD TRACTION, S.S.E. OFFICE, ONGOLE, PRAKADAM DISTRICT. EQUIPMENT 5. MOHAMMAD FARIDA, BEGUM WIFE OF LATE KHAZA MOHIDDIN AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS OCCUPATION HOMEMAKER, CARE OF MOHAMMED RAHIMUDDIN, OCCUPATIONTECHNICIAN, OVERHEAD EQUIPMENT, TRACTION, S.S.E. OFFICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2 6. MOHAMMAD PARVIN, WIFE OF ABDUL RAZAK AGED ABOUT 34 OCCUPATION HOMEMAKER, A RESIDENT OF 13-9-16, MARKET MASQUE, BAPATLA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents 2 and 3 in not initiating departmental inquiry on respondent no 4 and imposing a major penalty of Dismissal from service as per my complaints dated 12/08/2024 is illegal, arbitrary, and violation of Rule 13 A of Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966, article 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India and also principles of natural justice, consequently direct respondents 2 and 3 to initiating departmental inquiry on respondent no 4 imposing a major penalty of Dismissal from service as per my complaints dated 12/08/2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue direction to respondents no 2 and 3 dispose of my complaints dated 12/0S/2024 to pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BASHEER AHMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAJA REDDY KONETI 2. VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.2276 of 2025 ORDER: Sri Basheer Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 26.10.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present petition. 2. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY,J Date: 31.10.2025 SNI 4 67 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2276/2025 DATE: 31.10.2025 SNI