CWP-10243 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 CWP-10243 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:08.04.2025 Hukam Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Saguna Arora, AAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA , J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to release the retiral benefits etc. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset, on instructions from the petitioner, prays that at this stage, he will be satisfied if direction may be given to respondent No.2 to treat the instant writ petition as a representation and decide the same within a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection with regard to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. DINESH 2025.04.08 21:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10243 of 2025 (O&M) 2 4. In view of the facts mentioned above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 that in case the petitioner submits a copy of writ petition, the same may be treated as a representation and be decided within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. While considering the above said representation, all the contentions raised in the same may be considered. 5. The instant writ petition is disposed of in above said terms. (DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA) JUDGE April 08, 2025 dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.04.08 21:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document