1 2025:CGHC:46105-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2833 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Nihichalani, S/o. Kanhaiyalal Nihichalani, Aged About 52 Years R/o. Ward No. 13, Sindhi Camp, Near Neha Medical, Police Station Tilda Nevra, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Police Station Dharsiwa, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Ajay Nihichalani, S/o. Late Idandas Nihichalani, Aged About 50 Years R/o. Tilda, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Aditya Dhar Diwan, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, Advocate. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.09.11 10:30:26 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 10.09.2025 1. Heard Shri Aditya Dhar Diwan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate/respondent no. 1 as well as Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:- “ I. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by the petitioner. II. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the F.I.R. bearing No. 05/2023 registered at Police Station Dharsiwa, District Raipur (C.G.) on 02.01.2023 under section 420, Indian Penal Code. III. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash entire charge sheet bearing No. 99/2025 filed on 06.04.2025 (ANNEXURE P/1) before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.), under section 420, 467, 468 and 471 Indian Penal Code. 3 IV. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 23.04.2025 (ANNEXURE P/2) whereby the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur has taken cognizance of the impugned Chargesheet and registered the impugned criminal proceeding as Criminal Case no. 14577/2025 against the Petitioner. V. And to kindly grant any other relief to the petitioner as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case, may also granted to the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute. A copy of compromise deed, executed on 06.03.2025, has been annexed as Annexure P/12. 4. Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admitted the fact of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the documents. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the parties are directed to appear before the concerned trial Court within a period of two weeks. Thereafter the trial Court shall 4 verify the compromise deed and, on an appropriate application being filed, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a further period of two weeks. 7. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. 8. The compromise deed annexed in the petition may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Shoaib