APHC010080712020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 708 OF 2020 Between: 1. ATLURI VASUDEVA PRASAD, S/o. Late Sitaramaiah, Aged about 62 years, Hindu, 7622 E, Rose Garden Lane, Scotttsdale, Arizona 852555- 4789, USA ...Petitioner AND 1. ATLULRI PURNACHANDRA PRASAD, S/o late A Sitaramaiah, No.19, Wehatly Arena, Aberston Newyork 11507 - USA 2. N Srimannarayana, S/o late Veeraiah, Plot No.555A, Road No.27, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 033 3. Koripalli Prasunnamba, W/o late Koripalli Rama Krishna Rao, R/o 50-81- 70/7(13), Rajendra Nagar, Visakhapatnam 4. Koripalli Aditya Teja, S/o late Koripalli Rama Krishna Rao, R/o 50-81- 70/7(13), Rajendra Nagar, Visakhapatnam 5. Atluri Siva Rama Prasad, S/o late A Sitaramaiah, No.604, Brown Stone, Ridge Meridien, Connecticut - USA 6. Atluri Radha Krishna Prasad, , S/o late A Sitaramaiah, Susant Drive, Marlboro, New Jersey 07746, USA 7. Atluri Ramakrishna Prasad, , S/o late A Sitaramaiah, No.7622, E.Rose Garden, Lane Scottsdale A2, 85255, USA ...Respondents Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the orders dt.11-06-2019 passed by the learr Principal District Judge, Visakhapatnam in I.A.No.405/2018 in O.S.No.277/2012, the petitioner prefers the present Civil Revision Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings of O.S.No.2777/2012 on the file of Principal District Judge Court Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the main civil revision petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Respondents: G VENKATESULU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the suit pending before the Court below has already decreed in favour of the plaintiffs and thus, the instant civil revision petition became infructuous. 2. Having noted the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant civil revision petition is disposed of as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 06.11.2025 Dvs THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA 30 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 708 OF 2020 Date:06.11.2025 Dvs