LIYAKAT S/O RATTI MOHAMMAD B/C SAKKA MUSALMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5392/2018 · 2025-11-18
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42743 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42743 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46381] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5271/2018 Indar S/o Mohan, R/o Town Gopalgarh, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner/Accused Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan Through PP
2. Prem Prakash SI, Police Station, Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. ----Complainant/Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4829/2017 Sahid S/o Kamruddin, R/o Kajipada Mauhalla, Town Kaman, Police Station Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur. ----Petitioner/Accused Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through PP
2.
3. Ratan Lal SI, Police Station Kaman, Distt. Bharatpur. C & I Pikton India Pvt. Ltd., P. No.82, Sector No.44, Gurgaon, (Haryana). ----Complainant/Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5392/2018 Liyakat S/o Ratti Mohammad, R/o Town Gopalgarh, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner/Accused Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through PP
2. Prem Prakash SI, Police Station, Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. ----Complainant/Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5394/2018 Azrudin S/o Navi Khan, R/o Siyavali, Police Station Sikari, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner/Accused
[2025:RJ-JP:46381] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5271/2018] Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through PP
2. Prem Prakash SI, Police Station, Gopalgarh, District Bharatpur. ----Complainant/Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 18/11/2025 On the last date also nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, last opportunity was granted to learned counsel for the petitioners to argue the matter. Today, also no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to pursue these above petitions. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing their cases on merits. Therefore, the above petitions are hereby dismissed for non- prosecution.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /34-37