- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42801 RSA No. 516 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.516 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI.K.N.VENKATAREDDY S/O LATE C NARAYANAREDDY, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/AT KYASAGERE VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBALI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562105 2. SHRI CHIKKAVENKATAREDDY S/O LATE C NARAYANAREDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/AT KYASAGERE VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBALI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562105 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MUNIRAJ GOWDA V.,ADVOCATE [ ABSENT]) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42801 RSA No. 516 of 2024 AND: 1. KADIRAPPA S/O SOTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT KYASAGERE VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBALI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562105 2. CHIKKA MUNIYAPPA S/O SOTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT KYASAGERE VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBALI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 562105 3. NARAYANASWAMY S/O KADIRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT KYASAGERE VILLAGE, BASETTIHALLI HOBALI, SHIDLAGHATTA TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT -562105 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.02.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.37/2020 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42801 RSA No. 516 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT This appeal is filed on 19.03.2024 and the matter was listed before the Registrar on 26.03.2024 and on the said date, the counsel for the appellants was absent and time of three weeks was granted for compliance of office objections and the matter was listed before the Court on 24.04.2024 at the urgency cited by the learned counsel for the appellants by moving a memo for posting but the counsel for the appellants was absent on 24.04.2024 and the matter got adjourned subject to payment of cost. Today, the matter is listed before the Court for non-payment of cost and the counsel for the appellants is absent. Hence, it appears that the counsel for the appellants is not pursuing the matter diligently. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-payment of cost and also for non-prosecution. In view of dismissal of the main appeal, I.As. if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN