Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42737 (AP)

Palivela China Babu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13829/2019 · 2025-10-27

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010298562019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13829/2019 Between: PALIVELA CHINA BABU,, S / O. IMMANUEL, S.C., AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.18-140, LAKSHMI JANARDHANA COLONY, DOWLESWARAM, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOMES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN AREA, RAJ AMAHENDRAVARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. NAGA RAJU, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST ZONE, NEAR BOMMURU POLICE STATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SK HUSSAIN, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, SC AND ST CELL I, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, LALACHERUVU, RAJ AMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. VARA PRASAD, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJANAGARAM POLICE STATION, RAJ ANAGARAM, SEETANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. KROSURU JAGAN MOHANA RAO, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJANAGARAM POLICE STATION, RAJ ANAGARAM, SEETANAGARAM MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. KANCHERLA PRASAD, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJANAGARAM POLICE STATION, RAJANAGARAM, SEETANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13829 OF 2019 ORDER: Heard Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner through virtual conference and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that in this case the investigating officer was changed and another investigating officer, who was appointed in his place has concluded the investigation and laid the charge sheet before the concerned Court vide C.C.No.144 of 2019 on the file of the III Special Judge for S.C. and ST, Rajamahendravaram. 3. In those circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinion that the matter can be closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case, giving liberty to the writ petitioner to approach the concern Court for filing necessary objections if any, on the police report filed by the police, in accordance with law. 4. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 28.10.2025 Pab/Ks THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:13829 OF 2019 Date:28.10.2025 Pab/KS