Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42736 (CAL)

JOGEN SHARMA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRR/3818/2023 · 2025-06-23

Bibhas Ranjan De

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.09.2025 Court No.32 SL No.46 S.Gayen IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 3818 of 2023 with CRAN 1 of 2025 Jogen Sharma Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Kalian Kumar Chakraborty Mr. Gopal Krishan Sarkar Mr. Rananjay Chatterjee …for the Petitioner Mr. Anand Keshri Ms. Mamata Jana …for the State In Re: CRAN 1 of 2025 1. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken on record. 2. None appears on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of service. State is being represented. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has prayed for restoration of the revisional application which was dismissed for non-representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. It is submitted that at the relevant point of time the learned counsel for the petitioner remained absent due to his illness. 5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as explanations delineated in the petition itself, the prayer for restoration stands allowed. 6. The revisional application being CRR 3818 of 2023 be restored to its original file and number. 2 7. Accordingly, the application being CRAN 1 of 2025 stands disposed of. In Re: CRR 3818 of 2023 8. Let the matter appear in the combined monthly list of November, 2025. 9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)