APHC010644462012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 391/2012 Between: 1. CH. PADMAVATHI, W/O SESHI REDDY, MUNNANGI VARI PALEM, TSUNDURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. KATTA VENKATESWARLU AND 3 OTHERS, S/O BUSHAIAH, R/O TSUNDURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KATTA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU R/O TSUNDURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. KATTA VEERAIAH, S/O VENKATESWARLU R/O TSUNDURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP.BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NEAR AMBEDKAR STATUTE, 14TH LANE, ARUNDALPET, ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying that the High court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2011(MACMAMP 1264 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 36 days in filing the above MACMA against the OP.NO. 2 AHHS, J MACMA No.391 OF 2012 665 of 2009 dated 26-10-10 on the file of the MACT cum XIth Addl. District Judge, Guntur at Tenali. IA NO: 2 OF 2011(MACMAMP 1265 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with filing of original deposit certificate at present IA NO: 3 OF 2011(MACMAMP 1332 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the decree and all further proceedings passed in OP.No. 665 of 2009 dt. 26/10/2010 on the file of the MACT-cum- XI Additional District Judge, Guntur at Tenali IA NO: 1 OF 2012(MACMAMP 555 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the stay granted in MACMA.MP.No. 1332 of 2011 in MACMA(SR).No. 9683 of 2011 dt. 08/04/2011 by permitting the petitioners to withdraw the amount deposited Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C SUNIL KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GUDI SRINIVASU 2. PALLE SRINIVASA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 AHHS, J MACMA No.391 OF 2012 JUDGMENT: Sri Gudi Srinivasu, learned counsel for the respondent No.4/Insurance Company is present. 2. There is no representation for the appellant, despite the matter having been posted today i.e., on 26.12.2025 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. On 22.11.2025 also, there was no representation for the appellant. 3. Therefore, it evinces that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present MACMA is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Dated: 26.12.2025 MSI 4 AHHS, J MACMA No.391 OF 2012 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 391/2012 Dated: 26.12.2025 MSI