1 2025:CGHC:45787 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4818 of 2025 1 - Savita Dewangan W/o Umarchand Dewangan Aged About 49 Years R/o Colony Pahadipara, Gudhiyari, Tehsil And Dist Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Dist. Durg C.G. 2 - Additional Commissioner, Raipur Division, Dist. Raipur C.G. 3 - The Commissioner, Circuit Court, Bilaspur Division, Dist Bilaspur C.G. 4 - The Deputy Collector, Dist. Durg C.G. 5 - Sub-Divisional Revenue Officer, Patan, Dist. Durg C.G. 6 - Tehsildar, Patan, Dist. Durg C.G. 7 - The Commission, Durg Division, District Durg C.G. ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Piyush Bhoi, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Ajit Singh, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 09/09/2025 1. With the consent of the parties the matter is heard finally. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- 10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceedings going on before the learned Collector, Durg, in the interest of justice. Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.09.11 11:17:06 +0530 2 10.2That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction, thereby directing the respondent authorities to exchange the land of the petitioner, situated at pond with another place. 10.3 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the repeated erroneous proceeding by the respondent authorities to frustrate and harass the petitioner in a bad faith and is showing malice in the case which clearly shows the corrupt proceedings done again to exhaust this case against the interest of justice. The respondents authorities have not yet decided the case of the petitioner and are again preferring review against the order dated 21.05.2013 which has already been rejected by the learned commissioner (revenue) and also order is pending as per order-sheet dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P/1). 4. At the outset, learned counsel for respondents that with regard to the grievance of the petitioner, there is an alternative remedy is available to petitioner to file appeal under Section 44(2) of CG Land Revenue Code 1959. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 3 6. Considering the submission of the respondents and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that there is an alternative remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 44(2) of the CG Land Revenue Code 1959. The petitioner is at liberty to file appeal under Section 44(2) of the CG Land Revenue Code before appropriate forum within 15 days. 7. Meanwhile, only for the period of 15 days from today, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti