Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42730 (AP)

Akkarapaka Prabudh @ Akkarapakam Prabhudas, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2995/2022 · 2025-10-30

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038572022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2995/2022 Between: AKKARAPAKA PRABUDH @ AKKARAPAKAM PRABHUDAS,, S/O GUNAVARDHAN @ PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O. 13TH WARD, CAMEL STREET, NAGARAJA PURAM, SULLURU, SULLURPETA, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE NELLORE VI TOWN POLICE STATION, BALAJINAGAR, NELLORE TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER. 7. THE SULLURPET POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SULLURUPET, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4 to 7 respondents in Opening Suspect sheet No. 33/2013 against the petitioner and continuing the same when no cases are pending against him from the year 2017 as illegal, Arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently quash the Suspect sheet No. 33/2013 in the 7th respondent P.S, against the petitioner herein opened and continued by 4 to 7 respondents herein.” 2. Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no cases are pending against the Petitioner and hence, the suspect sheet opened against the Petitioner may be closed. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of counter, would submit that there are no cases pending against the Petitioner and in view of the public interest and to safeguard the residents of the vicinity where the Petitioner is residing, the impugned Suspect Sheet has been opened against the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is allowed and the impugned Suspect Sheet against the Petitioner is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:31.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2995 of 2022 Dt.31.10.2025 Dinesh