[2025:RJ-JP:32928] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 3576/2016 Abdul Vahid @ Bablu S/o Shri Abdul Rasheed Pathan, R/o C.A.D. Chouraha, Anta Thana Anta, District Baran. ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. Sirajurrahaman S/o Sh. Hamidurrahaman, R/o in front of Sahkari Petrol Pump Bamori, Anta Thana Anta. --------Complainant/Respondent No.1 2. The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Sajid Ali, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. Mr. Yenu Satyan, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi, Adv. (for the complainant/respondent No.1) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 21/08/2025 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 30.04.2016 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Baran (hereinafter referred to as the 'Revisional Court') in Criminal Revision Petition No.16/2016 whereby learned Revisional Court affirmed the order dated 12.01.2015 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Anta, District Baran (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial Court') and took cognizance against the petitioner. Vide the impugned order dated 12.01.2015, learned trial Court took cognizance under Section 406 of IPC in the matter arising out of FIR No.166/2013 registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran. [2025:RJ-JP:32928] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3576/2016] 2. Learned counsel appearing of behalf of the State submit the factual report dated 05.08.2023 and the same is taken on record. 3. As per the factual report dated 05.08.2023 submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State, after taking cognizance, the trial commenced against four accused persons namely Ramratan, Satyanarayan, Chauthmal and the present accused-petitioner Abdul Vahid. It has also been mentioned in the factual report that vide the impugned order dated 23.11.2022, learned trial Court has disposed of the matter and all the accused persons have already been acquitted, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this miscellaneous petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 5. Stay application and any other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /13