Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4273 (JHR)

BABU SHEIKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./816/2025 · 2025-02-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.816 of 2025 ------ 1. Babu Sheikh, aged about 43 years, son of Ashraf Sheikh, resident of Village- Hiranpur (Khas), P.O. Hiranpur (Khas), P.S. Pakur, District Pakur, Jharkhand 2. Farid Ansari, aged about 27 years, son of Sakil Ansari, resident of Village Kamalghati, P.O. and P.S. Hiranpur, District Pakur, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.183 of 2024 instituted under Sections 317 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act, 1960 and Section 12 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are respectively the owner and driver of a pick-up vehicle bearing Registration No. JH-06J-0628 which was seized by police while being involved in transportation of bovine animals for their illegal slaughter. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-18 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Spl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.183 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/