1 2025:CGHC:48227 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11056 of 2025 1 - Ramdhan S/o Late Bodhan Aged About 39 Years Caste- Pando, Occupation- Labour, R/o Village & P.O. Umeshwarpur, P.S. & Tahsil- Premnagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - The Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development, Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer District- Surajpur (C.G.) 6 - The Block Education Officer Premnagar, Distt.- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate For State : Mr. Keshav Gupta, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 19.09.2025 1. This petitioner has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents to reinstate him in his service with all consequential benefits and back wages, on the ground of parity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the case of the BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.09.23 11:03:18 +0530 2 petitioner is similar to the judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP(S) No. 3981 of 2012 and WP(S) No. 1032 of 2016 decided on 09.09.2015 and 20.06.2016 respectively wherein the petitioners were allowed to continue in service and would pray for considering the case of the petitioner at par with the petitioners therein. 3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make representation before the concerned authorities within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In the eventuality of filing representation by the petitioner, claiming parity at par with the judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court, the respondent authorities are directed to examine and consider the the same in accordance with law on its own merits. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner as aforestated. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika