1 2025:CGHC:11045-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3016 of 2024 1 - Lakshmi Bajaj W/o Late Jitendra Bajaj Aged About 34 Years R/o A/1 606, Gwalani Pride Shubham Vihar, Bilaspur, (C.G.) 2 - Dheeraj @ Appu Chandnani S/o L.T Manoj Kumar Chandnani Aged About 35 Years R/o A/1 606, Gwalani Pride Shubham Vihar, Bilaspur, (C.G.) 3 - Rani Bai W/o Lt. Manoj Kumar Chandnani Aged About 51 Years R/o A/1 606, Gwalani Pride Shubham Vihar, Bilaspur, (C.G.) 4 - Shyam Lalchandani S/o Lt. K.D. Lalchandani Aged About 45 Years R/o Sindhi Colony, Jarhabhata, Bilaspur, (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Home Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent of Police Bilaspur District Bilaspur, (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur , Distrcit Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Pradeep Kumar Arya Sho , Police Station Civil Lines Bilaspur, (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Shakuntala Bajaj W/o Mohanlal Bajaj Aged About 61 Years R/o Sindi Colony, Jarahabhata, Civil Lines, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (As Per Honble Court Order Dated 03-01-2025) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Akshat Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.03.07 10:19:07 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 06.03.2025 1. Heard Mr. Akshat Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash FIR No.0636/2024 against the petitioners because prima-facie no material has been collected against the petitioners for prosecuting the petitioner in the offence under Section 306/34 registered on the report of the complainant/respondent no.4 in the crime no. 636/2024 registered before the police station civil lines, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition to file afresh as the charge-sheet has been filed in this case. 4. Learned State counsel endorses the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. 3 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by the charge-sheet, if the matter survives. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu