SRI.SHIVKUMAR S/O GURUBASAYYA SWATANTRMATH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/101919/2019 · 2025-02-10
Hemant Chandangoudar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4271 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4271 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2672 CRL.P No. 101919 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101919 OF 2019 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHIVKUMAR S/O. GURUBASAYYA SWATANTRAMATH, AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. TAMBOLI GALLI, MUDHOL, TQ. MUDHOL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESH M.KHARVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY NAVALGUND P.S., R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580008.
2.
RAMAPPA NEELAPPA KATTIMANI AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, R/O. HEBBAL, TQ. NAVALGUND, DHARWAD-580112. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK T.KATTIMANI, ADDL. GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. RAJASHEKHAR S.ARANI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO, CALL FOR RECORDS ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT NAVALGUND IN C.C.NO.319/2019 UNDER CRIME NO.140/2018 AND QUASH THE ENTIRE CHARGE SHEET IN CC NO.319/2019 IN NAVALGUND P.S.CRIME NO.140/2016 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, NAVALGUND AND ALSO TAKING OF COGNIZANCE AND ISSUANCE OF PROCESS BY THE TRIAL COURT IN ABOVE CC 319/2019 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 279, 304(A) OF IPC
B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.02.15 12:54:55 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2672 CRL.P No. 101919 of 2019
AND U/S 154(A&B) 157 OF MV ACT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
Order dated 23.01.2025 allowing the petition is recalled. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn in separate order. Today learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition, reserving liberty to file an application for further investigation under Section 178(3) of Cr.P.C or in the alternative seeks for investigation in accordance with law.
2. Submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty as sought for.
All the contentions of the parties are kept open.
Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE TIN CT:VH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1