Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4271 (CHH)

SMT. SANTOSHI KURREY v. DR. SURESH KHUNTE

CRR/101/2020 · 2025-09-08

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45857 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 101 of 2020 1 - Smt. Santoshi Kurrey Wife Of Dr. Suresh Khunte Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Chpda Basti, Bishrampur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Yashabh Khunte Son Of Dr. Suresh Khunte Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Santoshi Kurrey. R/o Ward No. 4, Chpda Basti, Bishrampur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh .. Applicant(s) versus Dr. Suresh Khunte Son Of Sudha Ram Khute Aged About 38 Years Occupation Doctory, R/o House No. 113, Abedkar Chowk Senduras, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : Mr. Vivek Singhal, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 09.09 .2025 . 1. Heard Mr. Vivek Singhal, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. Shikar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the Non- KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 applicant. 2. By way of this revision, the applicants prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the revision and be pleased to make an order to enhance the maintenance amount awarded to the applicant No.2 in the award dated 27-11-2019 (Annexure A- 1) and also be pleased to make an order to award the maintenance amount in favour of applicant No.1 as prayed in the application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. filed before the learned Family Court Surajpur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that his client is not responding. It appears that the client has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 4. In view of the above, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the Family Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal