Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4271 (BOM)

YADAV PANDURANG TAMBE v. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION PROJECT MAJBUTIKARAN DIV. OMERGA AND ORS

CA/12665/2025 · 2026-08-29

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15--sr915.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12665 OF 2025 IN FA/2248/2018 Yadav Pandurang Tambe VERSUS The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Div. Omerga And Ors ---- Mr.R.V.Naiknaware, Advocate for applicants – claimants Mr.G.B.Rajale, Advocate for respondent – acquiring body Mr.K.B.Jadhavar, AGP for State ---- CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2026 ORDER :- Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 27.08.2014 passed by 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Osmanabad in L.A.R.No.599 of 2012 the acquiring body has preferred the First Appeal No.2248 of 2018. The project for acquisition is identified as “Kumbari-Korewadi Storage tank”. While securing stay to the execution and operation of the impugned judgment and award, the acquiring body has deposited entire payable award amount together with cost and interest. 2. Now, this application is moved by the legal representatives of the original claimant for the first time seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the acquiring body in this court. 3. Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the legal representatives of the original claimant are already brought on record in the First Appeal. He submits that in the identical matters arising out 2026:BHC-AUG:39758 2 15--sr915 of the same land acquisition project this court has permitted the claimants therein to withdraw 75% of the deposited amount by furnishing usual undertaking. On the same lines, withdrawal is sought by the present applicants. 4. Learned advocate for the acquiring body would not contradict such statement and would accept that the order dated 13.09.2022 passed by this Court in Civil Application No.1984 of 2022 in First Appeal No.2251 of 2018 [Devidas Ambadas Naikwadi (died) through L.Rs. Kusum and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.] can be relied upon. 5. In view of the above, present Civil Application is partly allowed by permitting the applicants to withdraw 75% of the amount deposited by the acquiring body, on furnishing a usual undertaking to the satisfaction of learned Registrar (Judicial) of this court. Needless to observe, withdrawal shall carry the interest accrued thereon. Balance amount be kept in Fixed Deposit. The Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ……….. KBP