1 2025:CGHC:48246 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10988 of 2025 1 - Kanti Devi Wd/o Late Puran Lal Gond, Aged About 66 Years R/o Tendua Para, Parsahi Nala, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 2 - Geeta Kashyap, Wd/o Late Suresh Prasad Kashyap, Aged About 53 Years Ward No. 6, Pratappur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 3 - Saida Fatma, Wd/o Late Adbul Ahad Firdausi, Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. 214, Nawagarh, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Gulabi Das, Wd/o Late Teju Das, Aged About 55 Years R/o Panika Para, Korima, Post Office- Urdara, Lundra, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Engineer In Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Superintendent Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 6 - The Superintendent Engineer (E/m), Public Health Engineering Department, District Raipur (C.G.) 7 - The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.09.22 10:41:39 +0530 2 8 - The Executive Engineer (E/m), Public Health Engineering Department, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate. For State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 19/09 /2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun