[2025:RJ-JP:50069] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19206/2025 Kedar Giri S/o Shri Lal Giri, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Math Daupura, Post Daupura, Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to pay equal salary to the petitioner as given to the juniors of petitioner namely Shri Ram Singh Yada and Sube Singh Yadav on the post of District Education Officer. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the action of the respondents be declared illegal by which they have paid less salary to the petitioner rather than the juniors on the post of District Education Officer. iii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to pay Rs.1,13,800/- per month w.e.f. 01.07.2022 as salary to the petitioner instead of Rs.1,10,500/- per months on the post of District Education Officer. iv) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in [2025:RJ-JP:50069] (2 of 2) [CW-19206/2025] the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. v) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/295