IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 133 GURPREET SINGH ALIAS GOPI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Advocates Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for the order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur in case arising out of FIR No.92 dated 12.11.2021 registered under Sections 307 and 34 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, at Police Stati whereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State due to his non-appearance and non him for 01.05.2025. 2. It is submitted by learned co some misunderstanding in noting the date of hearing, he could not appear there. His absence was not intentional. He is ready to join the proceedings before the trial Court and to abide by the terms and conditions to be upon him. Therefore, prayer has been made for allowing the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: GURPREET SINGH ALIAS GOPI Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Vipin Mahajan and Ms Chandanpreet Kaur Ahluwalia Advocates for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for the order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur in case arising out of FIR No.92 dated 12.11.2021 registered under Sections 307 and 34 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, at Police Station Dera Bana Nanak, Batala, District Gurdaspur, whereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State due to his appearance and non-bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against him for 01.05.2025. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that due to some misunderstanding in noting the date of hearing, he could not appear there. His absence was not intentional. He is ready to join the proceedings before the trial Court and to abide by the terms and conditions to be herefore, prayer has been made for allowing the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.18629 of 2025 Date of decision: 04.04.2025 …. Petitioner Versus …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA Vipin Mahajan and Ms Chandanpreet Kaur Ahluwalia, Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing 4) passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur in case arising out of FIR No.92 dated 12.11.2021 registered under Sections 307 and 34 of IPC and Section 25 of on Dera Bana Nanak, Batala, District Gurdaspur, whereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State due to his bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against unsel for the petitioner that due to some misunderstanding in noting the date of hearing, he could not appear there. His absence was not intentional. He is ready to join the proceedings before the trial Court and to abide by the terms and conditions to be imposed herefore, prayer has been made for allowing the present petition. quashing 4) passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurdaspur in case arising out of FIR No.92 dated 12.11.2021 registered under Sections 307 and 34 of IPC and Section 25 of on Dera Bana Nanak, Batala, District Gurdaspur, whereby his bail was cancelled and bonds were forfeited to the State due to his bailable warrants were ordered to be issued against unsel for the petitioner that due to some misunderstanding in noting the date of hearing, he could not appear there. His absence was not intentional. He is ready to join the proceedings imposed Jyoti 2025.04.05 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM 3. Though, no justification has been made out for setting aside the impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned trial Court while passing the counsel for the petitioner at this stage to grant the petitioner one more opportunity to surrender before the trial Court fact that the absence of the petitioner does no detaining him into custody as he is willing to join the trial and to ensure timely disposal of the cases before the learned trial Court, t petition is disposed of with learned trial Court further ordered that on h learned trial Court `5,000/- with DLSA, Gurdaspur and further subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed if the petitioner does not abide by this order. Petition stands disposed A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court. 04.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.18629 of 2025 Though, no justification has been made out for setting aside the impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned trial Court while passing the same, however, in view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage to grant the petitioner one more opportunity to surrender before the trial Court the absence of the petitioner does no detaining him into custody as he is willing to join the trial and to ensure timely disposal of the cases before the learned trial Court, t petition is disposed of with the direction to the petiti learned trial Court on or before 01.05.2025 i.e. the date fixed before it and it further ordered that on his surrender and on moving appropriate application, the trial Court shall admit him to bail subject to his depositin with DLSA, Gurdaspur and further subject to his furnishing personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed if the petitioner does not abide by this order. Petition stands disposed of. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No No.18629 of 2025 -2- Though, no justification has been made out for setting aside the impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned trial same, however, in view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage to grant the petitioner one more opportunity to surrender before the trial Court and further keeping in view the the absence of the petitioner does not attract the consequences of detaining him into custody as he is willing to join the trial and the ultimate aim is to ensure timely disposal of the cases before the learned trial Court, the present direction to the petitioner to surrender before the on or before 01.05.2025 i.e. the date fixed before it and it is surrender and on moving appropriate application, the admit him to bail subject to his depositing cost of with DLSA, Gurdaspur and further subject to his furnishing fresh personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall be deemed to be dismissed if the petitioner does not abide by this order. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No Though, no justification has been made out for setting aside the impugned orders as no illegality seems to have been committed by learned trial same, however, in view of the request made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage to grant the petitioner one more and further keeping in view the t attract the consequences of is he present oner to surrender before the is surrender and on moving appropriate application, the f h personal as well as surety bonds to its satisfaction. However, this petition shall Jyoti 2025.04.05 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document