Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42697 (PNJ)

DEEPAK SHARMA v. POONAM

CR/2059/2020 · 2025-08-12

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 252 CR-2059-2020(O&M) Date of decision: 12.08.2025 Deepak Sharma ...Petitioner(s) Vs. Smt. Poonam ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- None. *** NIDHI GUPTA, J. Notice in the present petition was issued vide order dated 20.08.2020, subject to payment of Rs.25,000/- as litigation expenses to the respondent. Office report indicates that the said payment has not been made till date. Subsequently, an application bearing CM-8780-CII-2020 has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of order dated 20.08.2020, and notice in the said application was issued vide order dated 29.09.2020. Thereafter, on 09.11.2020, following order was passed:- “Neither anyone is coming forward on behalf of the petitioner; nor litigation expenses, amounting to Rs.25,000/- have been paid to the respondent in compliance of order dated 20.08.2020. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Adjourned sine die.” SUNENA 2025.08.18 10:07 2. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. 29.07.2025, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of the above position, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. 12.08.2025 (Nidhi Gupta) Sunena Judge Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No